Armstead v. Neven et al
| Joe Kelly Armstead |
| Dwight Neven and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada |
| 2:2007cv01337 |
| October 3, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER THAT Assistant Federal Public Defender, John Lambrose is appointed to represent Joe Kelly Armstead for this appeal. Mr.Lambroses address is 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Suite 250, Las Vegas, NV 89101 and phone number is 702-388-6577. The clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Clerk of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/9/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
|
|
Filing
30
AMENDED ORDER Denying 1 the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is GRANTED on the followin g issues: Whether this court was correct in its ruling that the Nevada Supreme Courtreasonably applied clearly established federal law, as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States, when the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the prosec utors improper questions were not prejudicial given the overwhelming evidence of petitioners guilt; Whether this court was correct in its ruling that the Nevada Supreme Courtreasonably applied clearly established federal law, as defined by the S upreme Court of the United States, when the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners motion for a mistrial regarding the prosecutors improper questions. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/8/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is GRANTED on the following issues:1. Whether this court was correct in its ruling that the Nevada Supreme Court reasonably applied clearly established federal law, as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States, when the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the prosecutors improper questions were not prejudicial given the overwhelmin g evidence of petitioners guilt; 2. Whether this court was correct in its ruling that the Nevada Supreme Court reasonably applied clearly established federal law, as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States, when the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners motion for a mistrial regarding the prosecutors improper questions. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/11/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
