Cases 1 - 10 of 593
Perry v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-6325
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM REUBART, Reubart substituted for Dwight Neven (warden) per [56] Order
Petitioner:
PAULETTE WALKER PERRY
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
Antonetti v. Neven et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Joseph Antonetti
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee:
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Anthony Posey v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 23-15044
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MERITT POSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JEREMY BEAN and others
Gladys Perez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 22-15279
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLADYS PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, FLORENCE MCCLURE WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Manuel Melendez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-17135
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MELENDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brandyn Gayler v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-17028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, B. SANDOVAL, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Joseph Antonetti v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 21-16687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, R. BAKER, BYRNES, AKA Byrne and others
Evier Paez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-16621
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVIER DIAZ PAEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
