Imran v. Roberts et al
Plaintiff: Muhammad Imran
Defendant: Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation and Jay D Roberts
Case Number: 2:2014cv01532
Filed: September 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Granting 48 Stipulation of Dismissal. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Granting 43 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Filing Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Granting 41 Stipulation. Stipulation and Order for Dismissal due by 10/7/2016. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ON STIPULATION Granting 27 Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Future Lost Wages and Loss of Earning Capacity. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) Modified on 4/26/2016 (AC).
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 02/24/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Provide Joint Interim Status Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 8 Stipulation to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/6/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Imran v. Roberts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation
Represented By: Bruce Scott Dickinson
Represented By: Stephenson & Dickinson
Represented By: Michael E. Hottman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay D Roberts
Represented By: Bruce Scott Dickinson
Represented By: Stephenson & Dickinson
Represented By: Michael E. Hottman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muhammad Imran
Represented By: Ramzy P Ladah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?