Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rahman v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Faraaz Rahman
Defendant:
United Health Services Hospitals, Inc., Awais Ahmed, M. Farhan Nadeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-30370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
AKRAM v. AKRAM et al
as 2:2023cv23147
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD IMRAN AKRAM
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD SHAHID AKRAM, MUHAMMAD SHAHID HAYAT, SHOIB SAJJAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
AGANAN et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2023cv21410
Plaintiff:
RIZZA JANE GUANAO AGANAN, ALBERT BOAMPONG, HECTOR GARCIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Muhammad Imran-Shahid v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2626
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD IMRAN-SHAHID
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
