Miller et al v. Roberge
| Marie Miller, Dorothy Lafortune, Barbara Batson and Carl Weston |
| Scott Roberge |
| 1:2008cv00293 |
| July 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Strafford |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| James R. Muirhead |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
///ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss (Failure to Properly State a Claim, Lack of Standing and Younger v. Harris Abstention, et al.); dismissing as moot 8 Motion for Relief - requesting a ruling on the constitutionality and validity of her marriage to Philip Castora; dismissing as moot 12 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's 8/8/08 Exhibits for 8/4/08 Hearing (Court Document #9) & Plaintiff's 8/8/08 Rebuttal to Defense Exhibits for 8/4/08 Hearing (Court Document #1 0; dismissing as moot 13 Motion to Strike 5 Letter of Donald A. Love; dismissing as moot 15 Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena for Records Mailed to Defendant Chief Roberge by Dorothy Lafortune; dismissing as moot 17 Motion for Clerks Entry o f Default and Judgment as to Scott Roberge; dismissing as moot 18 Motion for Reconsideration Evidentiary Hearing; dismissing as moot 19 Motion to Strike 12 Motion to Strike. Roberge's motion for Rule 11 sanctions is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
