Collins v. University of New Hampshire et al
Plaintiff: John Collins
Defendant: University of New Hampshire, Bruce L. Mallory and Robert C. Whitten
Case Number: 1:2009cv00078
Filed: March 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Strafford
Presiding Judge: James R. Muirhead
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ///ORDER denying as moot 29 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony Relating to Plaintiff's Arrest; denying as moot 33 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of an Alleged Violation; denying as moot 34 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Stacie Sower's Employment History; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts III and IV. Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 RESCHEDULING ORDER, Oral argument on pending summary judgment motion and all pending motions set for 9/21/10 at 1:30 p.m. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 11/1/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Jur y Selection reset for 11/9/2010 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Jury Trial reset for 11/15/2010 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Oral Argument set for 9/21/2010 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (amm)
August 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER denying 21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
March 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ///ORDER granting 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor on Counts I and II. Count I and Count II are dismissed from this action. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (kad)
May 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge has retained a member of Orr & Reno for a personal matter. Signed by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. University of New Hampshire et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Collins
Represented By: Paul McEachern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of New Hampshire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce L. Mallory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert C. Whitten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?