Wentworth-Douglass Hospital v. Young & Novis Professional Association
Wentworth-Douglass Hospital |
Glenn H. Littell, Cheryl C. Moore and Young & Novis Professional Association |
1:2010cv00120 |
March 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Steven J. McAuliffe |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 200 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 139 defendants' motion to reconsider. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat) |
Filing 138 ///ORDER denying 79 and 81 plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment; and granting in part (as to Count V) and denying in part (as to all other counts) 84 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat) |
Filing 54 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 hospital's motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaims. So Ordered by Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (lag) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting 17 defendants' motion to enforce the stipulation. So Ordered by Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (lag) |
Filing 33 ORDER denying 16 defendants' motion to dismiss. So Ordered by Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (lag) Modified on 7/28/2010 to remove /// (vln). |
Filing 9 ORDER: Evidentiary Hearing re: 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/5/2010 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead.) Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (jab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.