Brown v. Englander et al
| Bruce Brown |
| Bernice Campbell, Celia Englander, Richard Gerry, Robert McLeod and William Wrenn |
| 1:2010cv00257 |
| July 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Steven J. McAuliffe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER denying without prejudice 43 Bill of Costs. (Follow up on Bill of Costs on 9/13/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(jab)
|
|
Filing
41
///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 and 27 defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat)
|
|
Filing
9
/// ORDER: plaintiff has adequately asserted an Eighth Amendment claim relating to denial of surgery, and state law claims against defendants Englander, McLeod, Gerry and Wrenn, including supervisory capacity claims. Claims all eging improper medical care for medication difficulties and claims against defendant Campbell are dismissed. Clerk's office to issue summonses for defendants Wrenn, McLeod, and Gerry to plaintiff's counsel to effect service. Plaintiff's counsel to provide a summons with a correct access for defendant Englander w/i 14 days of the date of this order. So Ordered by Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (jab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
