Zyla v. Caterpillar Inc

Defendant - Stayed: Caterpillar Inc
Plaintiff: Adminsistratrix Dorothy Zyla
Case Number: 1:2010cv00446
Filed: October 1, 2010
Court: New Hampshire District Court
Office: Concord Office
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 16, 2010 7 Opinion or Order of the Court CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (dae)
December 2, 2010 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER approving 5 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 10 days. Case Track: Complex.Trial: two-week period beginning 10/16/12. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 6/1/2012. Mediation Follow Up on 5/15/2012. (dae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zyla v. Caterpillar Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - stayed: Caterpillar Inc
Represented By: Richard P. Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adminsistratrix Dorothy Zyla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.