Farrelly v. Concord, City of et al
John Farrelly |
Walter Carroll, Concord, City of and Eric J. Pichler |
1:2010cv00583 |
February 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Landya B. McCafferty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ///ORDER granting in part 51 Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part 53 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot 54 Motion to Suspend Order. Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with the October 1 order, document no. 49 , as modified by this order, and close the case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla) |
Filing 50 ORDER re: 10/2/2012 Telephone Conference. Motions to reconsider shall be limited to 20 pages and due on or before October 30, 2012. Objections shall be limited to 10 pages and due on or before November 16, 2012. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad) |
Filing 48 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 40 Motion to Amend 32 Amended Complaint; denying as moot 46 Motion for Certification by NH Supreme Court to Question of Law. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla) |
Filing 9 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Seal Case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (mm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.