Oughman v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Plaintiff: Mohamed Oughman
Defendant: Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Case Number: 1:2011cv00075
Filed: February 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Steven J. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: Landya B. McCafferty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 /// ORDER approving the 40 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendant's 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER approving 33 Report and Recommendations; denying without prejudice 27 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
May 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER re 31 Objection to Order of April 10, 2012. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
April 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying without prejudice 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jab)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER approving 21 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 2 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Summary Judgment Motions due by 8/15/2012. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 3/15/2012. Discovery deadline 11/1/2012. Mediation Follow Up on 8/15/2012.(jab)
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 /// ORDER approving 5 Report and Recommendations; approving 14 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service. The Clerk's office is directed to forward a blank summons form to plaintiff, who must complete and return the summons form for defendant Scurry. The Clerk's office will issu e the summons and forward to US Marshal's Service with copies of the complaint (doc nos. 1, 3, 7 and 10), the Reports and Recommendations (doc. nos. 5 and 14), Order (doc. no. 6) and this order for service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jab)
August 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service: the Clerk's office is directed to forward a blank summons form to plaintiff, who must complete and return the summons form for defendant Barnes within 10 days. The Clerk's office will issue the summons and forward to US Marshal's Service with copies of the complaint (doc nos. 1 and 3), the Report and Recommendation, and this order for service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (jab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oughman v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohamed Oughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?