Bosonetto et al v. Richmond et al
| Jill Bosonetto and Nicolas Bosonetto |
| Sandra Gillis and Richmond, Town of |
| 1:2012cv00277 |
| July 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Condemnation |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Alter or Amend 34 Judgment. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
33
///ORDER granting 24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendants have conclusively shown that the res judicata effect of the state-court decisions bars the Bosonettos' claims in this action. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: Plaintiffs shall make proper service on or before December 14, 2012, or defendant Sean McElhiney will be dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Defendants Sandra Gillis and Town of Richmond shall file their response to the amended complaint within fourteen days of the date of this order. Plaintiffs shall serve Sean McElhiney with the amended complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, within twenty-one days of the date of this order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
