Mabardy v. Sanders et al
David Mabardy |
Kevin O'Keefe, John Korbey, Kensington, NH, Town of, Pamela Kehoe, Toritte Hendersoe, John/Jane Does, Scott Cain, Cheryll-Ann Andrews, Scott Sanders, James R. Smith, Michael Sullivan and Mark Weaver |
1:2013cv00341 |
July 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Paul J. Barbadoro |
Landya B. McCafferty |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS re: 4 Addendum/Exhibits 1 thru 3B to 1 Complaint. Good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the above-referenced addendum/exhibits filed by David Mabardy. The clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jeb) |
Filing 2 ORDER re 1 Complaint. The clerk's office shall docket the plaintiff's "Counter Claim For Damages Civil Rights Violations" as a civil complaint. Plaintiff also filed a document titled "Notice of Remov al for Good Cause." The court construes the "Notice of Removal for Good Cause" to be an separate action seeking to remove to this court a state criminal prosecution. This separate removal action will notbe docketed as such until a separate filing fee is paid pursuant to L.R. 4.4 or an in forma pauperis application has been filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1915 and L.R. 4.2. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(jeb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.