Peters v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner
| Matthew W. Peters |
| NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2015fp00025 |
| January 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Andrea K. Johnstone |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; approving 102 Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation having been approved, the clerk's office shall schedule a case management conference to, among other things, set new trial dates. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER approving 16 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 Motion to Amend, recommending the district judge should deny the motion to amend (doc. no. 15) as futile, to the extent it seeks to add legislators as defendants. The remaining relief requested in the motion to amend should be denied without prejudice to refiling in a separate motion to amend. See LR 7.1(a)(1). Follow up on Objections to R&R on 5/21/2015. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(ko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
