Nimco Real Estate Associates, LLC, et al v. Nashua, NH, City of, et al
Anoosh Irvan Kiamanesh, Nimco Real Estate Associates, LLC and Ultima Nashua Equipment Corporation |
NH Department of Transportation, Gregory G. Nadeau and Nashua, NH, City of |
1:2016cv00406 |
September 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph A. DiClerico |
Condemnation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ///ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Re: 36 Order on Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla) |
Filing 36 ///ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part 19 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part 22 Motion to Dismiss; de nying 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII are dismissed. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Counts VIII and IX, which are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting 28 Motion to Strike. Exhibit 2 to document no. 22 , the declaration of Mark Hasselmann, is struck. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.