BALTER V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RICHARD BALTER |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2008cv01475 |
March 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Mandamus & Other Office |
Camden |
Jerome B. Simandle |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 7/26/10. (js) |
Filing 14 OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 3/29/10. (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BALTER V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: RICHARD BALTER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | NORMAN JOEL GROSS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.