BUMGARNER v. UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: LARRY BUMGARNER
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 1:2008cv05245
Filed: October 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Atlantic
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 36 Motion. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 3/1/10. (js)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Denying 33 Motion to Vacate Judgments Obtained by Fraud and Motion for Preliminary Injunction with Brief in Support. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 1/28/10. (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BUMGARNER v. UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LARRY BUMGARNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?