BLACK v. BINDING SPECIALTIES, INC.
Plaintiff: JAMES BLACK
Defendant: BINDING SPECIALTIES, INC.
Case Number: 1:2009cv03670
Filed: July 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Pltf James Black be awarded a default judgment in the amount of $40,973.53 against Defendant Binding Specialties, Inc., etc.. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 2/23/12. (Order mailed to deft)(th, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BLACK v. BINDING SPECIALTIES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES BLACK
Represented By: TRACI M. GREENBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BINDING SPECIALTIES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?