MILLHOUSE v. ZICKEFOOSE
Petitioner: MATTHEW T. MILLHOUSE, JR.
Respondent: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Case Number: 1:2009cv06551
Filed: December 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Clerk shall serve a copy upon Petitioner and close file. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 03/30/2010. (tf, n.m. ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLHOUSE v. ZICKEFOOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MATTHEW T. MILLHOUSE, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?