PANNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: DERREK PANNELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2010cv00527
Filed: January 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED Petition is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. ORDERED Petitioner's applications and affidavits docketed #2 and #3 are DISMISSED as moot. ORDERED Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner and close the file. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 5/10/2010. (nz, )n.m.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PANNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DERREK PANNELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?