DECARIO v. WARDEN DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Petitioner: JULIAN DECARIO
Respondent: WARDEN DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Case Number: 1:2010cv02059
Filed: April 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the Petition is dismissed for lack of habeas jurisdiction. ORDERED that within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order, Petitioner shall either remit the $5.00 filing fee or a duly executed IFP application. (IFP applications, prisoner civil rights form, and notice mailed). Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 11/23/2010. (TH, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DECARIO v. WARDEN DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JULIAN DECARIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?