TUONI v. ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE DISCOVERY INCORPORATED
Plaintiff: CHRISTIANE M. TUONI
Defendant: ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE DISCOVERY INCORPORATED
Case Number: 1:2010cv02235
Filed: May 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 2/8/11. (js)
December 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 12/23/10. (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TUONI v. ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE DISCOVERY INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTIANE M. TUONI
Represented By: ROBERT C. THURSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE DISCOVERY INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?