ENGLISH v. TAYLOR et al
| DAVID ENGLISH |
| ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO, SHIFT SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #1, SHIFT SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #2, SHIFT SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #3, SHIFT SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #4, SHIFT SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #5, RODNEY GRECO, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, ARAMARK, INC and CAREY |
| 1:2010cv02854 |
| June 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Camden |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 4/3/2013. (drw)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDERED that the 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Counts IV & VI are DISMISSED; Defts Aramark, Inc., Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, and DieticianCarey are TERMINATED. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 10/15/2012. (drw)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP is DENIED, without prejudice; ORDERED that the Clerk shall supply to Petitioner a blank IFP form (sent); ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case; ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify the Court in writing within 30 days, etc.; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/15/2010. (dmr, )(n.m.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
