PAPOTTO v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: LISA M. PAPOTTO
Defendant: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2010cv04722
Filed: September 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Presiding Judge: Ann Marie Donio
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 12/30/2011. (tf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAPOTTO v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LISA M. PAPOTTO
Represented By: BENJAMIN GOLDSTEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?