HASKINS et al v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
| MIRIAM HASKINS and CALVIN ROGERS |
| FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2010cv05044 |
| September 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Burlington |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Joel Schneider |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
249
OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/30/2014. (drw)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER denying 127 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 1/27/2014. (drw)
|
|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Deft's 155 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Expert Report; denying Deft's request to re-depose Paktar and to submit "its own expert testimony on the subjects placed at issue for the first time in Mr. Paktars "Supplemental" Report". Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 9/26/2013. (drw)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER directing FIRST AMERICAN to send a request to its applicable present and former independent title agents requesting copies of the approximate 300-400 closing files the parties agreed will be produced, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 10/18/2012. (drw)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs claim under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act is DENIED. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 10/25/2011. (drw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
