DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER v. PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM et al
DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER |
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, PENN CARDIAC CARE AT CHERRY HILL, CLINICAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY, P.C., VIRTUA HEALTH, INC., VIRTUA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL BURLINGTON COUNTY, THE CARDIOLOGY GROUP, P.A. and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
1:2011cv01290 |
March 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Camden Office |
Burlington |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Karen M. Williams |
Antitrust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 268 OPINION. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 3/24/2015. (tf, ) |
Filing 83 OPINION & ORDER denying the Penn Defendants' 61 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 4/19/2012. (TH, ) |
Filing 57 ORDERED that Defts' 26 Motion to Dismiss, 27 Motion to Dismiss, 29 Motion to Dismiss & 45 Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply are GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART as set forth in the Opinion. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 12/30/2011. (drw, ) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting 20 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to MARK P. EDWARDS, Esq.. ORDERED that Mark P. Edwards, Esq. shall make a payment of $150.00 on each admission, payable to the Clerk, United States District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 4/19/2011. (TH, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.