White Knight Limousine, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff: White Knight Limousine, Inc.
Defendant: CATERPILLAR INC.
In Re: CATERPILLAR INC. C13 AND C15 ENGINE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number: 1:2014cv04597
Filed: July 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Referring Judge: Jerome B Simandle
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/20/2016. (tf, )
September 23, 2016 ***Civil Case Terminated. (tf, )
July 23, 2014 Filing 6 Clerk's Notice to Counsel. (dd, )
July 22, 2014 Filing 5 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:14-cv-01229. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: District of New Jersey. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. (DLB)
July 22, 2014 Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER regarding multidistrict litigation by Clerk of the Panel. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi on 7/22/2014. (KMS)
July 14, 2014 Filing 2 WAIVER of Service issued as to defendant Caterpillar Inc.. filed by White Knight Limousine, Inc.. (BAK)
July 10, 2014 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file Magistrate Consent form and all corporate parties must file Disclosure of Corporate Interest form. The forms can be found on the # court website. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Summons will not issue until Notice of Process Server and Original Filing Form are filed in case. (BAK)
July 10, 2014 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401. (CSAW)
July 9, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Caterpillar Inc. with receipt number 0865-4401041, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by White Knight Limousine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Burke, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2014: #5 Original Filing Form) (BAK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White Knight Limousine, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CATERPILLAR INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: CATERPILLAR INC. C13 AND C15 ENGINE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: White Knight Limousine, Inc.
Represented By: RICHARD J. BURKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?