HARRINGTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner: ALIK JEROME HARRINGTON
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 1:2014cv07447
Filed: December 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Atlantic
Presiding Judge: Robert B. Kugler
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM and ORDER Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter. ORDERED Petitioner has 30 days from the entry of this Order to reopen the matter. ORDERED Clerk shall send Petitioner a blank IFP application. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 12/12/2014. (nz, )n.m.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRINGTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: PAUL A. BLAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ALIK JEROME HARRINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?