PAVLYIK v. NOGAN et al
| MICHAEL PAVLYIK |
| PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 1:2019cv17691 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Duplicate Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by MICHAEL PAVLYIK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ssp, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER administratively terminating this case. ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case he shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall supply petitioner with a blank habeas petition form etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/30/2019. (cry, notice and form mailed)
|
|
***Civil Case Terminated. (cry, )
|
|
Filing 2
Letter from MICHAEL PAVLYIK re filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cry, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number CAM010691 (cry, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL PAVLYIK. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Brief in Support of Petition, #3 Appendix Vol. 1, #4 Appendix Vol. 2, #5 Appendix Vol. 3, #6 Envelope)(FF to be paid separately per letter from Petitioner)(ssp, ) (Duplicate scans of pages 3 and 12 removed on 9/23/2019) (cry, ). Modified on 9/23/2019 (cry, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
