NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. FIXTURE PERFECT, INC.
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent: FIXTURE PERFECT, INC.
Case Number: 2:2009cv03819
Filed: July 31, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Dennis M. Cavanaugh
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 03/29/2010. (nr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. FIXTURE PERFECT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Represented By: CURTISS T. JAMESON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FIXTURE PERFECT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?