NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC. et al v. OBAMA, et al
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC., MARIO A. CRISCITO, M.D. and ROE PATIENT |
BARACK OBAMA, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS |
2:2010cv01489 |
March 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Madeline C. Arleo |
Susan D. Wigenton |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC. identifying New Jersey Physicians, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (CONROY, ROBERT) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against MARIO A. CRISCITO, M.D., NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC., ROE PATIENT, filed by MARIO A. CRISCITO, M.D..(CONROY, ROBERT) (THE PARTIES AGAINST SHOULD READ AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER , TIMOTHY GEITHNER AND KATHLEEN SEBELIUS) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TIMOTHY GEITHNER, ERIC HOLDER, BARACK OBAMA,, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *Norma Rodriguez* (nr, ) Modified on 4/9/2010 (nr, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TIMOTHY GEITHNER, BARACK OBAMA,, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, ERIC HOLDER ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 000414.) NO JURY DEMAND, filed by NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC., MARIO A. CRISCITO, M.D., ROE PATIENT. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sm, ) Modified on 4/9/2010 (nr, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.