ALI-X v. POWER et al
KASEEM ALI-X |
TRACY POWER, ROBERT LAFORGIA, ANTONIO CAMPOS, JOHN DOE, FELDMAN, ROBINSON, VESSEL, WILLIAM, JR., KENNEDY, NELSON, KNIGHT, BEASLEY and FRANCLIN ESPINAL |
2:2010cv02990 |
June 11, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Union |
Dennis M. Cavanaugh |
Mark Falk |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 OPINION fld. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 5/28/14. (sr, ) |
Filing 54 OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 8/28/13. (sr, ) |
Filing 20 OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson on 8/1/11. (DD, ) |
Filing 12 ORDERED that the Clk of the Court is directed to file the Cmp in the above captioned action; ORDERED that all clms against Deft Franclin Espinal #523634 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as Pltf has alleged no facts suggesting that Deft Espinal is a stat e actor within the meaning of 1983; ORDERED that the Eighth Amendment failure to protect clm MAY PROCEED against all remaining Defts; ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue Summons, and the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Cmp, Summons and this Order upon the Defts. re 11 Letter. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 5/3/11. (dr, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 6/22/10. (sr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.