EUROPEAN COFFEE B.V. et al v. WILLEKES et al
Plaintiff: EUROPEAN COFFEE INC. and EUROPEAN COFFEE B.V.
Defendant: GEORGE WILLEKES, HOLLAND COFFEE INC., HOLLAND COFFEE (CALIFORNIA) INC., H.C. HOLLAND COFFEE B.V. and H.C. HOLLAND COFFEE BEHEER B.V.
Case Number: 2:2010cv03394
Filed: July 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: Madeline C. Arleo
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION for Reconsideration; that Pltf's motions to remand this action to the Superior Court of NJ, Chancery Division, Sussex County is GRANTED; that Pltfs' request for an award of atty's fees is DENIED; that Defts' motion for reconsideration of 6/18/10 be dismissed w/out prejudice.. Signed by Susan D. Wigenton on 10/7/10. (DD, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EUROPEAN COFFEE B.V. et al v. WILLEKES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EUROPEAN COFFEE INC.
Represented By: WARREN S. ROBINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EUROPEAN COFFEE B.V.
Represented By: WARREN S. ROBINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE WILLEKES
Represented By: THADDEUS R. MACIAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOLLAND COFFEE INC.
Represented By: THADDEUS R. MACIAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOLLAND COFFEE (CALIFORNIA) INC.
Represented By: THADDEUS R. MACIAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H.C. HOLLAND COFFEE B.V.
Represented By: THADDEUS R. MACIAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H.C. HOLLAND COFFEE BEHEER B.V.
Represented By: THADDEUS R. MACIAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?