MILLS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| KEITH DAVID MILLS |
| NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GARY M. LANIGAN |
| 2:2012cv01637 |
| March 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Middlesex |
| Stanley R. Chesler |
| Michael A. Shipp |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
OPINION AND ORDER; ORDERED that Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter is granted, and the Clerk shall file Plaintiffs Complaint; ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims raised jus tertii are dismissed for lack of standing; ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims, if any such claims were intended, seeking mandamus order enforcing a state court judgment are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims, if any such claims were intended, seeking to re-litigate state courts decisions are dismissed pursuant to the RookerFeldman doctrine,etc.; ORDERED that the Clerk shall close this action by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading CIVIL CASE CLOSED; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Memorandum Opinion and Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail and include in the said mailing a blank in forma pauperis form for confined individuals and a blank civil complaint form (blank informa pauperis and blank civil complaint forms mailed). Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 11/26/2012. (ld, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
