SWELTZ v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC. et al

Defendant: PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5
Plaintiff: BRENDA SWELTZ
Case Number: 2:2013cv01913
Filed: March 26, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Middlesex
Referring Judge: Joseph A. Dickson
Presiding Judge: Jose L. Linares
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SWELTZ v. PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC.
Represented By: RACHEL ANNE SEATON
Represented By: EBONEE HAMILTON LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRENDA SWELTZ
Represented By: ELIZABETH ZUCKERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.