SCHWARTZ et al v. KUO et al
BARBARA SCHWARTZ |
AHS HOSPITAL CORP./MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, IAN ATLAS, M.D., DARREN BLUMBERG, M.D., AARON CHEVINSKY, M.D., STEVEN GOSHLER, M.D., DAVID KUO, M.D., ALLIED SURGICAL GROUP and GARDEN STATE UROLOGY |
2:2013cv05227 |
August 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Morris |
Joseph A. Dickson |
Jose L. Linares |
Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC #69) for 66 Motion to Dismiss filed by AARON CHEVINSKY, M.D., 61 Motion to Dismiss, filed by IAN ATLAS, M.D., GARDEN STATE UROLOGY; that DefendantS' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for failure tocomply with the affidavit of merit statute [Docket Entry Nos. 61 and 66] are denied withoutprejudice as premature. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 4/23/14. (jd, ) |
Filing 69 Letter Opinion: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 66 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for failure to comply with Affidavit of Merit statute filed by AARON CHEVINSKY, M.D., 61 First MOTION to Dismiss due to a lack of AOM filed by IAN ATLAS, M.D., GARDEN STATE UROLOGY. Objections, if any, to R&R due by 4/22/2014. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiffs shall serve new affidavits of merit by April 30, 2014 to correct the deficiencies raised during the April 7, 2014 telephone conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson on 4/8/14. (jd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.