PTT, LLC v. GIMMIE GAMES et al
PTT, LLC |
GIMMIE GAMES, DANIEL MARKS, JOSEPH MASCI, BRIAN KAVANAGH, JOHN SMITH(S) 1 - 7 and XYZ COMPANIES 1-7 |
2:2013cv07161 |
November 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Bergen |
Joseph A. Dickson |
Jose L. Linares |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 485 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER; This matter comes before the Special Master upon a motion by defendants, for reconsideration of portions the Special Master's May 15, 2019 Order & Opinion. After considering the submissions of Defendants and Plaintiff High 5 Games, LLC ("H5G"), Defendants' motion is Denied in part and Granted in part; etc. Signed by Special Master Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.(Ret) on 9/23/2019. (sms) |
Filing 482 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER; To the extent Defendants argue that H5G should be precluded from relying on additional documents identified in the future, the Special Master notes that discovery is ongoing and that HSG is required to supple ment its responses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Accordingly, at this time it would be inappropriate for the Special Master to preclude H5G from offering documents beyond those identified in its response to Interrogatory No. 36. Sanctions are also improper at this time as H5G has not violated any discovery order. Accordingly, Defendants' motion is denied; etc. Signed by Special Master Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.(Ret) on 9/20/2019. (sms) |
Filing 471 OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 8/9/2019. (sms) |
Filing 436 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER; After considering the submissions of the parties, based upon the following, it is the opinion of the Special Master that Defendants' motion is granted; etc. Signed by Special Master Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.(Ret) on 5/10/2019. (sms) |
Filing 425 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER; After considering the submissions of the parties, based upon the following, it is the opinion of the Special Master that HSGs motion is GRANTED; etc. Signed by Special Master Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.(Ret) on 4/5/2019. (sms) |
Filing 423 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER; It is the opinion of the Special Master that Defendants shall make their source code available for inspection by H50 within 30 days of the date of this Order; etc. Signed by Special Master Dennis M. Cavanaugh, U.S.D.J.(Ret) on 3/27/2019. (sms) |
Filing 382 ORDER & OPINION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER re (1) Plaintiff shall serve Infringement Contentions pursuant to Local Patent Rules 3.1 and 3.2 and (2) Defendants request for a stay as to Infringement Contentions and discovery with respect to the new Third Amended Complaint corporate Defendants pending the Courts decision on the Defendants motions is denied; etc. Signed by Judge No Judge Assigned on 07/14/2018. (sms) |
Filing 326 OPINION re 231 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Pursuant to RPC 1.7 filed by HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 5/18/18. (LM, ) |
Filing 316 OPINION re 242 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 5/9/18. (LM, ) |
Filing 180 OPINION re 171 MOTION to Amend/Correct First Amended Complaint filed by HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 1/24/17. (LM, ) |
Filing 67 OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 11/6/14. (sr, ) |
Filing 65 OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 10/20/14. (sr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.