HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. SURIKOV
Plaintiff: HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Defendant: VADIM M. SURIKOV
Case Number: 2:2014cv01045
Filed: February 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Joseph A. Dickson
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION & ORDER granting Pltf HICA's 9 Motion for Default Judgment against Deft Vadim M. Surikov. Judgment is entered against Deft Vadim M. Surikov in the amount of $41,733.26, etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 1/21/2015. (drw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. SURIKOV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Represented By: KARINA VELTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VADIM M. SURIKOV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?