PROANO v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff: LAURA PROANO
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Case Number: 2:2014cv05853
Filed: September 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Hudson
Presiding Judge: Joseph A. Dickson
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's motion to dismiss, (D.E. No. 5); the Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice; that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 6/25/2015. (ld, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROANO v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAURA PROANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Represented By: MICHAEL T. BISSINGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?