TAYLOR v. STEVENSON et al
BRIAN L TAYLOR |
JOHN T STANKEY, MICHAEL WHITE and RANDALL L STEVENSON |
2:2019cv18602 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Steven C Mannion |
John Michael Vazquez |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER that the Complaint is withdrawn. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 11/5/2019. (sm) |
Filing 5 Letter from Brian L. Taylor dated 10/25/2019. (sm) |
Filing 4 Letter from Brian Taylor. (sm) |
Filing 3 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED; and it is further ordered that Plaintiff is afforded 30 days to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies, etc. (N/M). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 10/10/19. (lag, ) |
COMPLAINT against JOHN T STANKEY, RANDALL L STEVENSON, MICHAEL WHITE with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRIAN L TAYLOR. See D.E. #1 for Complaint.(lag, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by BRIAN L TAYLOR. (byl) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(bt, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2019: #6 Text of Proposed Order) (bt, ). (Attachment 6 replaced on 10/2/2019) (bt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.