UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRENK
| 3:2006cv01004 |
| March 3, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mary L. Cooper |
| John J. Hughes |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; this Court FURTHER FINDS that Trenk has waived the attorney-client privilege with respect to the documents at issue; that the Clerk of the Court designate this action as CLOSED. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 4/1/2011. (mmh)
|
|
Filing
71
OPINION filed re 63 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court Order entered February 26, 2009, 62 MOTION for Reconsideration re 61 Order Dismissing Case, UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 5/8/2009. (mmh)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION filed re 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 2/26/2009. (mmh)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 30 MOTION for Reconsideration re 28 Opinion,, 29 Order. Signed by Judge Mary L. Cooper on 1/22/07. (ck, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRENK | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
