SHANGHAI CONTAKE CHEMICALS, LTD. v. GREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Plaintiff: SHANGHAI CONTAKE CHEMICALS, LTD.
Defendant: GREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Case Number: 3:2008cv06209
Filed: December 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office
County: Somerset
Presiding Judge: Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Presiding Judge: Joel A. Pisano
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 27:185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION Signed by Judge Joel A. Pisano on 12/1/2009. (ss, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHANGHAI CONTAKE CHEMICALS, LTD. v. GREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANGHAI CONTAKE CHEMICALS, LTD.
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER THOMAS SCANLON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?