EDWARDS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| ROBERT LEE EDWARDS |
| STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES |
| 3:2009cv03979 |
| August 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Lois H. Goodman |
| Anne E. Thompson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 12/13/2012. (eaj)
|
|
Filing
96
OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 10/18/2011. (eaj)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Defts CMS and David Meeker's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 25 State Defts' Motion to Dismiss; dismissing Pltf's breach of contract claims; terminating Deft Jon Corzine. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 3/8/2010. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
21
Opinion and Order denying 15 application for Pro Bono Counsel for ROBERT LEE EDWARDS Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 12/23/2009. (ss, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER granting pltf's. application to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Clerk to file Complaint; dismissing NJDOC as a dft; for the Clerk to issue summons and USM to serve same; and directing Clerk to supply a pro bono application with Appendix H attached Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 9/2/2009. (ss, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
