JONES v. SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
Plaintiff: RICCO N. JONES
Defendant: SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., MATTHEW MURPHY and JANE AND JOHN DOE
Case Number: 3:2015cv02629
Filed: April 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Somerset
Presiding Judge: Lois H. Goodman
Presiding Judge: Freda L. Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM & ORDER directing the Clerk to Strike the 58 Third Amended Complaint in Case 15-cv-2629; Dismissing the 12 Amended Complaint in Case 18-cv-10189 in its entirety; Denying further leave to amend in each case, and directing the Clerk to send this Memorandum and Order to the Plaintiff and close both matter accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 4/26/2022. (jal, ) Modified on 4/26/2022 (jal, ).
February 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall mark cases 15-2629 and 18-10189 as OPEN so that the Court may consider Plaintiff's submission; the Clerk shall file Plaintiff's Motion for Relief 50 in case 18-10189; the Motion for Relief 50 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's filing of an Amended Complaint and request to reopen in case 18-10189; Plaintiff has 45 days from the date of the Memorandum and Order to file an Amended Complaint in case 18-10189; the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE cases 15-2629 and 18-10189. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 2/27/2020. (jem)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 3/8/2018. (mps)
April 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 4/6/2017. (mps)
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 9/9/2015. (eaj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JONES v. SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICCO N. JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH WALSH, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW MURPHY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE AND JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?