Valet v. Astrue

Valet v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Argentina Valet
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2010cv03282
Filed:	July 19, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Kiyo A. Matsumoto
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 23, 2012	Filing 20 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court denies plaintiff's and defendant's cross-motions for jud gment on the pleadings and remands this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand, the ALJ shall: (1) Re-examine the opinions of plaintiff's treating physicians, Dr. Stuart D. Kaplan and Dr. Eric S. Lippman, and provi de sufficient explanations for the weight afforded to their opinions. (2) Consider all of the factors required by 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529(c) and S.S.R. 96-7p in determining the credibility of plaintiff's statements regarding her symptoms and the effects of her impairments. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close the case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/23/2012. (Winterkorn, Margaret)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 23, 2012

Filing 20 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court denies plaintiff's and defendant's cross-motions for jud gment on the pleadings and remands this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand, the ALJ shall: (1) Re-examine the opinions of plaintiff's treating physicians, Dr. Stuart D. Kaplan and Dr. Eric S. Lippman, and provi de sufficient explanations for the weight afforded to their opinions. (2) Consider all of the factors required by 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529(c) and S.S.R. 96-7p in determining the credibility of plaintiff's statements regarding her symptoms and the effects of her impairments. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close the case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/23/2012. (Winterkorn, Margaret)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valet v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Argentina Valet
Represented By:	Charles E. Binder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?