McMahon v. Napolitano et al
||Rachelle Lewis, James T. Madden, Teresa Halpin, W. Daniel Baldwin, Geraldine Munsayac, Cynthia Covell and Janet Napolitano
||Joyce A. McMahon
||March 13, 2013
||New York Eastern District Court
||Robert M. Levy
||Kiyo A. Matsumoto
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 8, 2013
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing certain individual defendants. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Also as set for th in the within Order, plaintiff's claims against defendants W. Daniel Baldwin, Cynthia Covell, Teresa Halpin, James T. Madden, Rachelle Lewis, and Geraldine Munsayac are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). No summons sha ll issue as to these defendants. Plaintiff's complaint against the remaining defendant, Secretary Janet Napolitano, may proceed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a summons for this defendant and the United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the complaint and this Order on this defendant without prepayment of fees. The case is also respectfully referred to the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The clerk of court is also respectfully requested to serve a copy of the within Order on the pro se plaintiff and to note service of the same on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/8/2013. (Kelley, Jamuna)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.