Cases 1 - 10 of 8,308
D'Alessandro v. United States of America
as 24-2671
Defendant:
EARL DELONG, ERIC HOLDER, SEAN GALLAGHER and others
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE D'ALESSANDRO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen Malloy v. City of San Francisco, et al
as 21-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON and others
Stephen Malloy v. Regents of the University, et al
as 21-16535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, STEVE BUSTAMANTE, UCOP Chief of Ethics & Compliance Attorney, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Cornelius Lopes v. Kevin DeLeon, et al
as 21-16476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNELIUS LOPES
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN DELEON, NANCY PELOSI, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01194
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
