Beede et al v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. et al
| Clifford P. Beede, Sherry E. Halligan, Eileen Mottl and Catherine G. Weeks |
| Stiefel Laboratories, Inc., Charles W. Stiefel, Brent D. Stiefel, Todd Stiefel, Stephen Karasick, Michael Cornelius and Matt S. Pattullo |
| 1:2013cv00120 |
| January 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Columbia |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 81 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion in Limine. After carefully reviewing the entire record in this mat ter, the parties' submissions and the applicable law, and for the above-stated reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 81) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 86) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 89) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/7/2016 (bto)
|
|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 67 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED (Dkt. No. 65); and the Court fu rther ORDERS that Defendants' First and Second Counterclaims, as well as their First and Eighth Affirmative Defenses are DISMISSED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED (Dkt. No. 67); and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/30/2015. (ban)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that 30 Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that 30 Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/6/14. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
