US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Rodriguez v. Armstrong et al
as 9:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas Armstrong, Margaret Harney-Mathew and Deputy Sheriff John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Keith Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. Jane Doe
as 9:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartle v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jean Hartle
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mehrotra v. General Electric Company (GE)
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Shashi Mehrotra
Defendant:
General Electric Company (GE) and GE Vernova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Keith v. Mahar et al
as 5:2024cv01244
Defendant:
Colin Mahar and Officer Drury
Plaintiff:
David Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Court Security Officers v. Centerra Group, LLC
as 1:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
United States Court Security Officers
Defendant:
Centerra Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Finney v. ERSG US Holdings Inc.
as 6:2024cv01238
Defendant:
ERSG US Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff:
Devon Finney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Barzee v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv01237
Defendant:
Kyle Harrington, Emily "Roe", Santina Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Saio Barzee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
