Northern District of New York Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 18,500
Hopkins v. Russell et al
as 6:2015cv00636
Plaintiff: Scott Robert Hopkins
Defendant: Robert Russell, Wendy Russell, Adam Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
White v. York et al
as 9:2015cv00640
Plaintiff: Dante White
Defendant: Nathan H. York, Michael T. Gates, R.R. Tourge
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Syracuse Police Department
as 5:2015cv00638
Plaintiff: David McCullough
Defendant: Syracuse Police Department
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
CLARK et al v. COMPANION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv00628
Plaintiff: LARRY W CLARK , KIM O CLARK
Defendant: COMPANION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Zap v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00624
Plaintiff: Cynthia Zap
Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Santander Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maiello et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2015cv00632
Plaintiff: Vickie R. Maiello , Anthony J. Maiello, Jr.
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Binder v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00629
Plaintiff: Abby Binder
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fox v. Hobbie et al
as 6:2015cv00616
Plaintiff: Javell Fox
Defendant: Edna P. Hobbie , Anne Lamont , Sgt. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Stephens v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00622
Plaintiff: Duane Stephens
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Terrill et al v. Windham-Ashland-Jewett Central School District et al
as 1:2015cv00615
Plaintiff: Carol Terrill , Michael Terrill
Defendant: Windham-Ashland-Jewett Central School District, Kerry Overbaugh
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.