Searles v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Steven Marshall Searles
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2014cv01124
Filed: September 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DECISION & ORDER that the 13 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks is hereby ADOPTED; and the Commissioner's decision is hereby AFFIRMED; and the pltf's complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/30/2015. (see)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Searles v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Marshall Searles
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?